https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44208 A quasi-judicial order under excise law was held unsustainable because it was cryptic and non-speaking, with no reasons given for rejecting the exemption claim. The court reiterated that an order made in exercise of quasi-judicial power must disclose reasons and show application of mind; failure to do so vitiates the decision. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision after granting the parties a reasonable opportunity of being heard. en-us Thu, 06 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:05:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44208 A quasi-judicial order under excise law was held unsustainable because it was cryptic and non-speaking, with no reasons given for rejecting the exemption claim. The court reiterated that an order made in exercise of quasi-judicial power must disclose reasons and show application of mind; failure to do so vitiates the decision. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision after granting the parties a reasonable opportunity of being heard. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44208