https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44197 Review of the dismissal of a writ petition was refused because the earlier forum selection was found proper: the principal respondents were based in Bombay and the excise and sales tax demands were claimed and realised there. The court reiterated that writ jurisdiction is discretionary and must be exercised on equitable considerations. A mere connection of one respondent with Delhi, or some business activity linked to Delhi, did not justify interference with the earlier view that the Bombay High Court was the appropriate forum. The dismissal of the writ petition therefore remained undisturbed. en-us Fri, 08 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:39:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44197 Review of the dismissal of a writ petition was refused because the earlier forum selection was found proper: the principal respondents were based in Bombay and the excise and sales tax demands were claimed and realised there. The court reiterated that writ jurisdiction is discretionary and must be exercised on equitable considerations. A mere connection of one respondent with Delhi, or some business activity linked to Delhi, did not justify interference with the earlier view that the Bombay High Court was the appropriate forum. The dismissal of the writ petition therefore remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44197