<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (8) TMI 70 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44194</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the appeal under s.35L of the Central Excise Act because the impugned decision favored the appellant and did not pertain to the rate of duty or value of goods for assessment. The Court declined to consider the substantive merits of the question previously decided by the Full Bench of the Tribunal, leaving that issue unaddressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (8) TMI 70 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44194</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the appeal under s.35L of the Central Excise Act because the impugned decision favored the appellant and did not pertain to the rate of duty or value of goods for assessment. The Court declined to consider the substantive merits of the question previously decided by the Full Bench of the Tribunal, leaving that issue unaddressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>