https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772321 The Gujarat HC declined to entertain a writ petition challenging a GST adjudication order involving disputed product turnover calculations. The adjudicating authority found discrepancies between the petitioner's declared supply value of Rs. 693,92,53,454/- in GSTR-1 returns versus Rs. 115,60,11,418/- claimed in their reply, without proper reconciliation. The court held that these factual disputes regarding GST liability quantification required verification and constituted disputed questions of fact. Following Supreme Court precedent in Commercial Steel Limited, the HC disposed of the petition without examining merits, directing the petitioner to pursue the alternative remedy of filing an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 107 of the GST Act. en-us Thu, 08 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Jun 2025 08:33:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772321 The Gujarat HC declined to entertain a writ petition challenging a GST adjudication order involving disputed product turnover calculations. The adjudicating authority found discrepancies between the petitioner's declared supply value of Rs. 693,92,53,454/- in GSTR-1 returns versus Rs. 115,60,11,418/- claimed in their reply, without proper reconciliation. The court held that these factual disputes regarding GST liability quantification required verification and constituted disputed questions of fact. Following Supreme Court precedent in Commercial Steel Limited, the HC disposed of the petition without examining merits, directing the petitioner to pursue the alternative remedy of filing an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 107 of the GST Act. Case-Laws GST Thu, 08 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772321