<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 102 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44187</link>
    <description>Where appeals and stay applications are pending before the competent appellate forum, coercive recovery of the disputed excise demand should not be pursued until those proceedings are decided. The court therefore restrained recovery action and granted interim protection against locking the factory premises or attaching plant, machinery, or stock, while directing the appellate forum to dispose of the pending matters expeditiously.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:26:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 102 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44187</link>
      <description>Where appeals and stay applications are pending before the competent appellate forum, coercive recovery of the disputed excise demand should not be pursued until those proceedings are decided. The court therefore restrained recovery action and granted interim protection against locking the factory premises or attaching plant, machinery, or stock, while directing the appellate forum to dispose of the pending matters expeditiously.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>