https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89131 CESTAT adjudicated a complex excise duty valuation dispute involving petroleum product sales. The tribunal determined that Rule 4 of Valuation Rules was incorrectly invoked, and Rule 6 was not properly applied in the show-cause notice. The court found no evidence of additional monetary consideration beyond the transaction value. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the original order, allowing the appellant's appeal and ruling that no duty demand, interest, or penalty was sustainable against the appellant based on procedural and substantive legal grounds. en-us Fri, 06 Jun 2025 08:30:44 +0530 Fri, 06 Jun 2025 08:30:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89131 CESTAT adjudicated a complex excise duty valuation dispute involving petroleum product sales. The tribunal determined that Rule 4 of Valuation Rules was incorrectly invoked, and Rule 6 was not properly applied in the show-cause notice. The court found no evidence of additional monetary consideration beyond the transaction value. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the original order, allowing the appellant's appeal and ruling that no duty demand, interest, or penalty was sustainable against the appellant based on procedural and substantive legal grounds. Highlights Central Excise Fri, 06 Jun 2025 08:30:44 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89131