<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 354 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772241</link>
    <description>The Rajasthan HC ruled that promotion from Commissioner of Income Tax to Chief Commissioner of Income Tax is not a vested right. The respondent-applicant was found unsuitable for promotion based on Annual Confidential Reports from the preceding five years, which failed to meet the required &quot;Very Good&quot; benchmark. The Departmental Promotion Committee&#039;s decision on 18.11.2009 was deemed proper and without bias. The Court held that while the respondent&#039;s right to be considered for promotion was not infringed, he could not claim entitlement to actual promotion. The writ petition was allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 08:30:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 354 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772241</link>
      <description>The Rajasthan HC ruled that promotion from Commissioner of Income Tax to Chief Commissioner of Income Tax is not a vested right. The respondent-applicant was found unsuitable for promotion based on Annual Confidential Reports from the preceding five years, which failed to meet the required &quot;Very Good&quot; benchmark. The Departmental Promotion Committee&#039;s decision on 18.11.2009 was deemed proper and without bias. The Court held that while the respondent&#039;s right to be considered for promotion was not infringed, he could not claim entitlement to actual promotion. The writ petition was allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>