<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 362 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772249</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA upheld the provisional attachment order against a former Senior Manager of MECON Ltd. who received Rs. 1,65,45,000 as illegal gratification from two companies through various bank accounts. The appellant failed to justify property transactions worth Rs. 1.25 crores, including enhancement of property rates and could not provide credible evidence of legitimate sale transactions. The cancellation of sale agreement dated 12.10.2012 nullified the claimed receipt of sale consideration. The Tribunal found no illegality in the attachment order and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 08:30:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 362 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772249</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA upheld the provisional attachment order against a former Senior Manager of MECON Ltd. who received Rs. 1,65,45,000 as illegal gratification from two companies through various bank accounts. The appellant failed to justify property transactions worth Rs. 1.25 crores, including enhancement of property rates and could not provide credible evidence of legitimate sale transactions. The cancellation of sale agreement dated 12.10.2012 nullified the claimed receipt of sale consideration. The Tribunal found no illegality in the attachment order and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>