<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 369 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772256</link>
    <description>Recovery under section 28AAA of the Customs Act cannot proceed where the export incentive instrument has not first been cancelled or held invalid by the competent foreign trade authority; customs authorities have no parallel power to disregard the instrument on allegations of collusion or suppression. A statement recorded under section 108 is not admissible in adjudication unless the mandatory procedure under section 138B is followed, including examination of the maker as a witness. Because the impugned confiscation and penalties rested on that inadmissible statement and lacked the required foreign trade determination, the recovery, confiscation and penalties were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 08:30:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 369 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772256</link>
      <description>Recovery under section 28AAA of the Customs Act cannot proceed where the export incentive instrument has not first been cancelled or held invalid by the competent foreign trade authority; customs authorities have no parallel power to disregard the instrument on allegations of collusion or suppression. A statement recorded under section 108 is not admissible in adjudication unless the mandatory procedure under section 138B is followed, including examination of the maker as a witness. Because the impugned confiscation and penalties rested on that inadmissible statement and lacked the required foreign trade determination, the recovery, confiscation and penalties were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>