<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 387 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772274</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune ruled in favor of the assessee regarding denial of benefits under section 115BAC due to belated filing of Form 10IE. The Tribunal held that filing Form 10IE is directory, not mandatory, following precedent in Akshay Devendra Birari case. Since Form 10IE was already available with CPC during return processing under section 143(1), the Tribunal directed CPC to amend intimation considering the available form and allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for new tax regime benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 10:39:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 387 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772274</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune ruled in favor of the assessee regarding denial of benefits under section 115BAC due to belated filing of Form 10IE. The Tribunal held that filing Form 10IE is directory, not mandatory, following precedent in Akshay Devendra Birari case. Since Form 10IE was already available with CPC during return processing under section 143(1), the Tribunal directed CPC to amend intimation considering the available form and allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for new tax regime benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>