<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 396 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772283</link>
    <description>Penalty for non-appearance in response to a section 142(1) notice was found unsustainable because the assessee showed reasonable cause for the default. The explanation that the failure to comply arose from the serious ill health of the assessee&#039;s mother was accepted, so the statutory basis for penalty was not established. The penalty under section 272A(1)(d) was therefore deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 08:30:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 396 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772283</link>
      <description>Penalty for non-appearance in response to a section 142(1) notice was found unsustainable because the assessee showed reasonable cause for the default. The explanation that the failure to comply arose from the serious ill health of the assessee&#039;s mother was accepted, so the statutory basis for penalty was not established. The penalty under section 272A(1)(d) was therefore deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>