<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 405 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772292</link>
    <description>ITAT Cuttack held that cash deposits made during demonetization period cannot be treated differently from other business receipts. The tribunal ruled that entire bank deposits of Rs. 66,53,561/- should be considered as business turnover, with net profit estimated at 8% under section 44AD, resulting in taxable income of Rs. 5,32,285/- instead of the entire deposit amount assessed by AO. Appeal was partly allowed with consequential relief granted to assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 08:30:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 405 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772292</link>
      <description>ITAT Cuttack held that cash deposits made during demonetization period cannot be treated differently from other business receipts. The tribunal ruled that entire bank deposits of Rs. 66,53,561/- should be considered as business turnover, with net profit estimated at 8% under section 44AD, resulting in taxable income of Rs. 5,32,285/- instead of the entire deposit amount assessed by AO. Appeal was partly allowed with consequential relief granted to assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>