<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 411 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772298</link>
    <description>Delhi HC directed Revenue to correct TDS records and credit NRI assessee&#039;s account despite deductor&#039;s error in using incorrect form for resident Indian instead of NRI form. Revenue&#039;s inability to correct error due to SOP requiring buyers&#039; consent and indemnity bond was rejected. Court ordered Revenue to reflect TDS deposit in petitioner&#039;s credit under Form 26QB from deposit date, compute refund due, and set aside non-conforming orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 08:30:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 411 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772298</link>
      <description>Delhi HC directed Revenue to correct TDS records and credit NRI assessee&#039;s account despite deductor&#039;s error in using incorrect form for resident Indian instead of NRI form. Revenue&#039;s inability to correct error due to SOP requiring buyers&#039; consent and indemnity bond was rejected. Court ordered Revenue to reflect TDS deposit in petitioner&#039;s credit under Form 26QB from deposit date, compute refund due, and set aside non-conforming orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>