<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 413 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772300</link>
    <description>The HC ruled that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act to make additions in the absence of incriminating material during search operations. The court affirmed that without specific evidence found during the search, the AO cannot reassess or make fresh additions. The assessment order was declared invalid, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s original decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 08:30:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 413 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772300</link>
      <description>The HC ruled that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act to make additions in the absence of incriminating material during search operations. The court affirmed that without specific evidence found during the search, the AO cannot reassess or make fresh additions. The assessment order was declared invalid, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s original decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>