<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (4) TMI 85 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44174</link>
    <description>The court quashed the seizure of cloves and javitri, holding it unlawful due to the absence of the condition precedent for exercising power under Section 110 of the Customs Act. The court emphasized that the belief leading to the seizure was not reasonable but based on suspicion, invalidating the seizure. The parties were directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:55:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (4) TMI 85 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44174</link>
      <description>The court quashed the seizure of cloves and javitri, holding it unlawful due to the absence of the condition precedent for exercising power under Section 110 of the Customs Act. The court emphasized that the belief leading to the seizure was not reasonable but based on suspicion, invalidating the seizure. The parties were directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>