https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44163 Advance licences obtained by fraud and misrepresentation do not justify discretionary writ relief under Article 226 when the petition seeks to avoid the consequences of breach of import and export conditions. The Court treated the fraudulent procurement of the licences as a decisive bar to relief and held that a party acting dishonestly cannot use writ jurisdiction to regularise imports or secure permission years later to discharge the export obligation. An earlier appellate observation on regularisation of imports already effected did not create a fresh entitlement to seek such permission. The request was therefore rejected. en-us Thu, 08 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:11:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44163 Advance licences obtained by fraud and misrepresentation do not justify discretionary writ relief under Article 226 when the petition seeks to avoid the consequences of breach of import and export conditions. The Court treated the fraudulent procurement of the licences as a decisive bar to relief and held that a party acting dishonestly cannot use writ jurisdiction to regularise imports or secure permission years later to discharge the export obligation. An earlier appellate observation on regularisation of imports already effected did not create a fresh entitlement to seek such permission. The request was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 08 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44163