https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772149 CESTAT Case Summary: Excise Duty on BagasseThe Tribunal ruled against the Revenue's demand for Excise Duty on Bagasse, affirming its exemption status. Relying on HC and SC precedents, the tribunal held that Bagasse, a by-product classified under CET entry 23032000 with nil duty, does not attract reversal of Cenvat credit under Rule 6(3). The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed, rejecting the Revenue's contention of common input usage justifying duty demand. en-us Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jun 2025 08:25:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772149 CESTAT Case Summary: Excise Duty on BagasseThe Tribunal ruled against the Revenue's demand for Excise Duty on Bagasse, affirming its exemption status. Relying on HC and SC precedents, the tribunal held that Bagasse, a by-product classified under CET entry 23032000 with nil duty, does not attract reversal of Cenvat credit under Rule 6(3). The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed, rejecting the Revenue's contention of common input usage justifying duty demand. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772149