<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 268 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772155</link>
    <description>NCLAT Principal Bench rejected appellant&#039;s challenge to resolution plan approval. CoC allocated nil amount to appellant in approved resolution plan. Appellant claimed violation of waterfall mechanism under Section 53 of IBC. NCLAT held resolution plans cannot be approved unless minimum payment made to operational creditors and dissenting financial creditors per liquidation value under Section 53. However, CoC has exclusive jurisdiction over resolution plan terms through commercial wisdom. Adjudicating authority lacks equity-based jurisdiction and can only verify statutory compliance under Section 30(2). NCLAT cannot review CoC&#039;s commercial decisions on equitable grounds. Appeal dismissed as devoid of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 08:25:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 268 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772155</link>
      <description>NCLAT Principal Bench rejected appellant&#039;s challenge to resolution plan approval. CoC allocated nil amount to appellant in approved resolution plan. Appellant claimed violation of waterfall mechanism under Section 53 of IBC. NCLAT held resolution plans cannot be approved unless minimum payment made to operational creditors and dissenting financial creditors per liquidation value under Section 53. However, CoC has exclusive jurisdiction over resolution plan terms through commercial wisdom. Adjudicating authority lacks equity-based jurisdiction and can only verify statutory compliance under Section 30(2). NCLAT cannot review CoC&#039;s commercial decisions on equitable grounds. Appeal dismissed as devoid of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>