<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 287 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772174</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee regarding cash deposits made during the demonetization period. The tax authorities had treated these deposits as unexplained cash credits under section 68 and sought to tax them under section 115BBE. The tribunal found that the assessee operated legitimately in the loan business, with deposits representing loan repayments from customers in the unorganized sector who lacked proper banking facilities. The assessee provided adequate documentation including loan account details and bank statements showing historical cash deposit patterns. The tribunal concluded that no suspicious activity was established and the loans were not fictitious, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and deleting the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 08:25:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 287 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772174</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee regarding cash deposits made during the demonetization period. The tax authorities had treated these deposits as unexplained cash credits under section 68 and sought to tax them under section 115BBE. The tribunal found that the assessee operated legitimately in the loan business, with deposits representing loan repayments from customers in the unorganized sector who lacked proper banking facilities. The assessee provided adequate documentation including loan account details and bank statements showing historical cash deposit patterns. The tribunal concluded that no suspicious activity was established and the loans were not fictitious, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and deleting the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>