<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 289 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772176</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai deleted addition u/s 69A regarding unexplained cash receipt. The tribunal found a clear chain of transaction where cash was transferred from one party to another party, then to the assessee, who gave it to children of a third party. Since the cash flow was traceable and explained through documented transactions, the addition treating it as unexplained money was deemed without merit. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed for both assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 08:25:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 289 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772176</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai deleted addition u/s 69A regarding unexplained cash receipt. The tribunal found a clear chain of transaction where cash was transferred from one party to another party, then to the assessee, who gave it to children of a third party. Since the cash flow was traceable and explained through documented transactions, the addition treating it as unexplained money was deemed without merit. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed for both assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>