<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 290 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772177</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the tax appeal involving cash deposits during demonetization. While rejecting the full addition of Rs. 8.10 Crores as unexplained cash credits, the court made a nominal addition of Rs. 20 Lakhs to address potential revenue leakage. The decision was based on the assessee&#039;s properly maintained books of accounts, audited records, and demonstrated business turnover, emphasizing that unexplained cash credits cannot be added merely on suspicion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 08:25:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 290 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772177</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the tax appeal involving cash deposits during demonetization. While rejecting the full addition of Rs. 8.10 Crores as unexplained cash credits, the court made a nominal addition of Rs. 20 Lakhs to address potential revenue leakage. The decision was based on the assessee&#039;s properly maintained books of accounts, audited records, and demonstrated business turnover, emphasizing that unexplained cash credits cannot be added merely on suspicion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>