<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 297 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772184</link>
    <description>ITAT Chandigarh dismissed two tax appeals challenging CIT&#039;s orders under Section 263 of Income Tax Act. The tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s decision to set aside assessment orders for AYs 2012-13 and 2014-15 due to inadequate investigation of share application money and premium. The assessee failed to provide evidence supporting the genuineness of capital inflows, and the tribunal found no procedural error in the CIT&#039;s action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 08:25:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 297 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772184</link>
      <description>ITAT Chandigarh dismissed two tax appeals challenging CIT&#039;s orders under Section 263 of Income Tax Act. The tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s decision to set aside assessment orders for AYs 2012-13 and 2014-15 due to inadequate investigation of share application money and premium. The assessee failed to provide evidence supporting the genuineness of capital inflows, and the tribunal found no procedural error in the CIT&#039;s action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>