<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 310 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772197</link>
    <description>An ex parte first appellate order was set aside because the assessee had not been afforded a proper opportunity of hearing before the appeal was decided on a TDS default demand under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The ITAT held that, in the interest of substantial justice, the matter required reconsideration by the first appellate authority on notice and after hearing the assessee. The case was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 08:25:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 310 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772197</link>
      <description>An ex parte first appellate order was set aside because the assessee had not been afforded a proper opportunity of hearing before the appeal was decided on a TDS default demand under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The ITAT held that, in the interest of substantial justice, the matter required reconsideration by the first appellate authority on notice and after hearing the assessee. The case was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>