<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 67 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44155</link>
    <description>The court emphasized the need to balance revenue interests with avoiding undue hardship on importers and directed the respondents to promptly consider releasing the goods and complete investigations within specified timelines. The court criticized the withholding of goods despite industry necessity and urged a balanced approach, acknowledging the petitioner&#039;s reliance on essential components and the impact on manufacturing operations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:39:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 67 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44155</link>
      <description>The court emphasized the need to balance revenue interests with avoiding undue hardship on importers and directed the respondents to promptly consider releasing the goods and complete investigations within specified timelines. The court criticized the withholding of goods despite industry necessity and urged a balanced approach, acknowledging the petitioner&#039;s reliance on essential components and the impact on manufacturing operations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>