<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 318 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772205</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned because the Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation based on non-resident status, medical emergencies, and difficulty in using the e-portal. On the quantum issues, the disallowance relating to cost of construction was sustained only to the extent supported by lack of documentary evidence, while the disallowance for cost of improvement was deleted. The assessee therefore obtained partial relief, and the additions were reduced accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 08:25:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 318 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772205</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned because the Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation based on non-resident status, medical emergencies, and difficulty in using the e-portal. On the quantum issues, the disallowance relating to cost of construction was sustained only to the extent supported by lack of documentary evidence, while the disallowance for cost of improvement was deleted. The assessee therefore obtained partial relief, and the additions were reduced accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>