<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 321 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772208</link>
    <description>The SC/ITAT upheld the addition of Rs. 14,84,52,240 as unexplained share capital under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The appellant-company failed to provide evidence proving the source of share capital from 413 persons, despite multiple notices. Given the ongoing liquidation proceedings and absence of representation, the Tribunal disposed of the appeal ex-parte, affirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s original order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 08:25:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 321 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772208</link>
      <description>The SC/ITAT upheld the addition of Rs. 14,84,52,240 as unexplained share capital under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The appellant-company failed to provide evidence proving the source of share capital from 413 persons, despite multiple notices. Given the ongoing liquidation proceedings and absence of representation, the Tribunal disposed of the appeal ex-parte, affirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s original order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>