https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44154 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's decision not to modify the stay order and direction for the petitioners to deposit the balance amount of pre-deposit. The Court found that the petitioners' failure to comply with the initial order, delayed application for modification, and subsequent extension granted by the Tribunal did not warrant interference. Emphasizing the principles of waiver and estoppel, the Court held that the petitioners' conduct precluded them from contesting the payment of the balance pre-deposit amount. Therefore, the Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, dismissing the writ petition. en-us Wed, 24 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:38:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44154 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's decision not to modify the stay order and direction for the petitioners to deposit the balance amount of pre-deposit. The Court found that the petitioners' failure to comply with the initial order, delayed application for modification, and subsequent extension granted by the Tribunal did not warrant interference. Emphasizing the principles of waiver and estoppel, the Court held that the petitioners' conduct precluded them from contesting the payment of the balance pre-deposit amount. Therefore, the Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, dismissing the writ petition. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 24 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44154