https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772219 HC ruled that the appellate authority under GST Act erroneously rejected an appeal on limitation grounds. The court found the two-day delay justified, given the petitioner's lack of GST portal knowledge. Relying on precedent, the HC held that appellate authorities have discretionary power to condone delays beyond one month if sufficient cause exists. The impugned order was set aside, directing the authority to hear the appeal on merits within eight weeks. en-us Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jun 2025 08:25:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772219 HC ruled that the appellate authority under GST Act erroneously rejected an appeal on limitation grounds. The court found the two-day delay justified, given the petitioner's lack of GST portal knowledge. Relying on precedent, the HC held that appellate authorities have discretionary power to condone delays beyond one month if sufficient cause exists. The impugned order was set aside, directing the authority to hear the appeal on merits within eight weeks. Case-Laws GST Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772219