<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 340 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772227</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC disposed of a writ petition challenging attachment of bank accounts after finding that the petitioner had already availed appellate remedy under Section 107 of the CGST Act following a Section 74 order. The court held that since the SCN proceedings had culminated and the petitioner pursued statutory appeal, the bank account freezing order dated 28th May 2024 would automatically stand lifted. The petition became infructuous as alternative remedy was available and utilized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 340 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772227</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC disposed of a writ petition challenging attachment of bank accounts after finding that the petitioner had already availed appellate remedy under Section 107 of the CGST Act following a Section 74 order. The court held that since the SCN proceedings had culminated and the petitioner pursued statutory appeal, the bank account freezing order dated 28th May 2024 would automatically stand lifted. The petition became infructuous as alternative remedy was available and utilized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>