<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 346 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772233</link>
    <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging tax demand related to fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC). The court found the impugned orders legally sustainable, noting goods-less transactions by the supplier and lack of merit in the petitioner&#039;s arguments. While denying pre-deposit waiver, the HC allowed appellate remedies under CGST Act, emphasizing that detailed factual scrutiny is beyond writ jurisdiction and best addressed through statutory appeal mechanisms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 346 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772233</link>
      <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging tax demand related to fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC). The court found the impugned orders legally sustainable, noting goods-less transactions by the supplier and lack of merit in the petitioner&#039;s arguments. While denying pre-deposit waiver, the HC allowed appellate remedies under CGST Act, emphasizing that detailed factual scrutiny is beyond writ jurisdiction and best addressed through statutory appeal mechanisms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>