<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 347 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772234</link>
    <description>Delhi HC dismissed a petition challenging a GST show cause notice and ex-parte order under Section 73(9) of CGST Act. The petitioner argued the document was merely a summary, not a valid notice, due to incorrect title description. The court held that despite the erroneous title &quot;Summary of Show Cause Notice&quot; instead of &quot;Show Cause Notice under Section 73,&quot; the document&#039;s substance prevailed over form. The portal description, watermark, and accompanying documents clearly indicated it was a valid notice. The court found the petitioner&#039;s contention frivolous and aimed at justifying non-compliance. The ex-parte order was upheld as sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:41:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 347 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772234</link>
      <description>Delhi HC dismissed a petition challenging a GST show cause notice and ex-parte order under Section 73(9) of CGST Act. The petitioner argued the document was merely a summary, not a valid notice, due to incorrect title description. The court held that despite the erroneous title &quot;Summary of Show Cause Notice&quot; instead of &quot;Show Cause Notice under Section 73,&quot; the document&#039;s substance prevailed over form. The portal description, watermark, and accompanying documents clearly indicated it was a valid notice. The court found the petitioner&#039;s contention frivolous and aimed at justifying non-compliance. The ex-parte order was upheld as sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>