<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 352 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772239</link>
    <description>Where an appellate remedy was available, the Bombay High Court nevertheless entertained the petition at the interim stage and granted limited protection. The court stayed the impugned order until the next date, but made relief conditional on deposit of 10% of the tax demand. It also directed lifting of the attachment of the specified bank accounts, thereby providing interim relief against both the order and the freezing measures pending further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 352 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772239</link>
      <description>Where an appellate remedy was available, the Bombay High Court nevertheless entertained the petition at the interim stage and granted limited protection. The court stayed the impugned order until the next date, but made relief conditional on deposit of 10% of the tax demand. It also directed lifting of the attachment of the specified bank accounts, thereby providing interim relief against both the order and the freezing measures pending further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>