<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1275 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462243</link>
    <description>HC ruled that due to the petitioner&#039;s wife&#039;s critical medical condition requiring expensive treatment, the 2nd respondent must promptly review and process any request to withdraw funds from specified bank accounts. The respondent is mandated to decide and issue orders within one week of receiving such a request, with a follow-up hearing scheduled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 19:04:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1275 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462243</link>
      <description>HC ruled that due to the petitioner&#039;s wife&#039;s critical medical condition requiring expensive treatment, the 2nd respondent must promptly review and process any request to withdraw funds from specified bank accounts. The respondent is mandated to decide and issue orders within one week of receiving such a request, with a follow-up hearing scheduled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>