<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 84 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44147</link>
    <description>Repeated delay at successive stages, together with procedural defects such as lack of proper authorisation and non-payment of court fees, did not establish sufficient cause for condonation of delay in customs appeals and revision. The petitioners&#039; claim that they were awaiting clarification was insufficient because the appellate remedy could have been pursued in time without waiting for that clarification. On these facts, the Tribunal&#039;s refusal to condone delay was upheld and no judicial interference was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:15:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 84 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44147</link>
      <description>Repeated delay at successive stages, together with procedural defects such as lack of proper authorisation and non-payment of court fees, did not establish sufficient cause for condonation of delay in customs appeals and revision. The petitioners&#039; claim that they were awaiting clarification was insufficient because the appellate remedy could have been pursued in time without waiting for that clarification. On these facts, the Tribunal&#039;s refusal to condone delay was upheld and no judicial interference was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>