<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 82 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44142</link>
    <description>A customs refund already allowed by the Appellate Collector and affirmed by the appellate tribunal could not be withheld once the departmental challenge failed and no further proceedings were taken. On that basis, the continued non-payment was unjustified, and the petitioner was entitled to refund of the excess customs duty with interest from the date of the tribunal&#039;s order until payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:45:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 82 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44142</link>
      <description>A customs refund already allowed by the Appellate Collector and affirmed by the appellate tribunal could not be withheld once the departmental challenge failed and no further proceedings were taken. On that basis, the continued non-payment was unjustified, and the petitioner was entitled to refund of the excess customs duty with interest from the date of the tribunal&#039;s order until payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>