<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (7) TMI 97 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44140</link>
    <description>Complete restraint by investigating officers amounts to arrest in law from the point of total custody and control, so detention beyond 24 hours without production before a Magistrate breaches Article 22(2) and Article 21 of the Constitution. The text also notes corresponding non-compliance with Sections 57 and 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Other objections concerning panch witnesses and alleged violations of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act were not treated as the basis for the outcome. The operative result stated is that the detention was unconstitutional and illegal, and bail followed from that breach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:37:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (7) TMI 97 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44140</link>
      <description>Complete restraint by investigating officers amounts to arrest in law from the point of total custody and control, so detention beyond 24 hours without production before a Magistrate breaches Article 22(2) and Article 21 of the Constitution. The text also notes corresponding non-compliance with Sections 57 and 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Other objections concerning panch witnesses and alleged violations of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act were not treated as the basis for the outcome. The operative result stated is that the detention was unconstitutional and illegal, and bail followed from that breach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>