<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Procedural Gaps in E-Way Bill Compliance Don&#039;t Automatically Trigger Penalties Without Proven Tax Evasion Intent</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89081</link>
    <description>HC determined that mere non-completion of part-B of e-way bill does not automatically warrant penalty under Section 129 of U.P. G.S.T. Act, 2017. The court found no evidence of tax evasion attempt by the petitioner. Without a specific finding regarding intentional tax evasion, the penalty levy was deemed unsustainable. Consistent with prior judicial precedents, the court emphasized that procedural non-compliance alone cannot justify punitive action. The impugned order was consequently set aside, and the petition was allowed, effectively quashing the penalty imposed by the tax authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 08:40:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 08:40:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Procedural Gaps in E-Way Bill Compliance Don&#039;t Automatically Trigger Penalties Without Proven Tax Evasion Intent</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89081</link>
      <description>HC determined that mere non-completion of part-B of e-way bill does not automatically warrant penalty under Section 129 of U.P. G.S.T. Act, 2017. The court found no evidence of tax evasion attempt by the petitioner. Without a specific finding regarding intentional tax evasion, the penalty levy was deemed unsustainable. Consistent with prior judicial precedents, the court emphasized that procedural non-compliance alone cannot justify punitive action. The impugned order was consequently set aside, and the petition was allowed, effectively quashing the penalty imposed by the tax authorities.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 08:40:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>