<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Funds Legitimately Received Through Share Transfer Invalidate Provisional Attachment Order Under Rule 8(6)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89051</link>
    <description>AT held that the Provisional Attachment Order for Rs. 2.84 crores against the appellant is set aside, as the funds were legitimately received through banking channels from share transfer to a third party. Regarding the Rs. 11 crores proceeds of crime, the parties agreed to maintain status quo, with property possession unchanged and no alienation permitted until trial conclusion. The attachment order was deemed improper as the appellant demonstrated a valid source of funds through a transparent financial transaction. Appeal partially allowed with specific directives preserving the property&#039;s current status pending final judicial determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 08:40:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 08:40:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Funds Legitimately Received Through Share Transfer Invalidate Provisional Attachment Order Under Rule 8(6)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89051</link>
      <description>AT held that the Provisional Attachment Order for Rs. 2.84 crores against the appellant is set aside, as the funds were legitimately received through banking channels from share transfer to a third party. Regarding the Rs. 11 crores proceeds of crime, the parties agreed to maintain status quo, with property possession unchanged and no alienation permitted until trial conclusion. The attachment order was deemed improper as the appellant demonstrated a valid source of funds through a transparent financial transaction. Appeal partially allowed with specific directives preserving the property&#039;s current status pending final judicial determination.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 08:40:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>