<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 184 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772071</link>
    <description>The SC/Tribunal examined service tax liability for foreign bank charges in export proceeds. It ruled that exporters are not liable for service tax when foreign banks deduct charges during export proceeds remittance, as no direct service relationship exists between exporters and foreign banks. The Tribunal rejected extended limitation period and penalties, setting aside the original tax demand based on established legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 08:40:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 184 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772071</link>
      <description>The SC/Tribunal examined service tax liability for foreign bank charges in export proceeds. It ruled that exporters are not liable for service tax when foreign banks deduct charges during export proceeds remittance, as no direct service relationship exists between exporters and foreign banks. The Tribunal rejected extended limitation period and penalties, setting aside the original tax demand based on established legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>