<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 77 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44129</link>
    <description>The writ petition filed challenging the Customs Tribunal&#039;s order confiscating gold and cash due to alleged illegal purchase was allowed. The court emphasized the importance of timely notice delivery under Section 124 of the Customs Act, criticizing the Tribunal&#039;s failure to address this issue adequately. The confiscation of cash not linked to smuggled goods and other unaddressed appeal points further highlighted the inadequacy of the Tribunal&#039;s decision. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, costs were awarded, and the matter was remitted for a comprehensive rehearing in compliance with legal standards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:07:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 77 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44129</link>
      <description>The writ petition filed challenging the Customs Tribunal&#039;s order confiscating gold and cash due to alleged illegal purchase was allowed. The court emphasized the importance of timely notice delivery under Section 124 of the Customs Act, criticizing the Tribunal&#039;s failure to address this issue adequately. The confiscation of cash not linked to smuggled goods and other unaddressed appeal points further highlighted the inadequacy of the Tribunal&#039;s decision. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, costs were awarded, and the matter was remitted for a comprehensive rehearing in compliance with legal standards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>