<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 202 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772089</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal against winding up proceedings under Sections 271-272 of Companies Act, 2013 due to delay in filing beyond statutory limitation. Appellant admitted receiving impugned order on 02.11.2023 but filed appeal on 08.02.2024, resulting in 54-day delay beyond the 45-day limitation period under Section 421. NCLAT found no sufficient cause for condonation and held the delay exceeded tribunal&#039;s maximum condonable period of 45 additional days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 08:40:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 202 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772089</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal against winding up proceedings under Sections 271-272 of Companies Act, 2013 due to delay in filing beyond statutory limitation. Appellant admitted receiving impugned order on 02.11.2023 but filed appeal on 08.02.2024, resulting in 54-day delay beyond the 45-day limitation period under Section 421. NCLAT found no sufficient cause for condonation and held the delay exceeded tribunal&#039;s maximum condonable period of 45 additional days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>