https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772093 CESTAT Mumbai-AT allowed appeal by CB firm against Principal Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai's order revoking CB license, forfeiting security deposit, and imposing penalty. Court found no violation of CBLR 2018 Regulations 10(a), 10(d), and 10(n). CB firm was not proven to have actively facilitated fraudulent exports or aided exporter in claiming ineligible export incentives. Alleged violations were primarily exporter's actions, not CB's responsibility. CB had fulfilled KYC obligations and cannot be expected to identify mis-declarations that customs authorities themselves didn't detect during processing. Impugned order set aside. en-us Mon, 02 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jun 2025 08:40:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772093 CESTAT Mumbai-AT allowed appeal by CB firm against Principal Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai's order revoking CB license, forfeiting security deposit, and imposing penalty. Court found no violation of CBLR 2018 Regulations 10(a), 10(d), and 10(n). CB firm was not proven to have actively facilitated fraudulent exports or aided exporter in claiming ineligible export incentives. Alleged violations were primarily exporter's actions, not CB's responsibility. CB had fulfilled KYC obligations and cannot be expected to identify mis-declarations that customs authorities themselves didn't detect during processing. Impugned order set aside. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 02 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772093