<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 220 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772107</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai quashed a re-assessment notice dated 29/07/2022 issued under section 148 for assessment year 2015-16, finding it barred by limitation. Following the Supreme Court precedent in Rajeev Bansal, the tribunal held that the notice was time-barred under the Act&#039;s provisions. Consequently, the entire re-assessment proceedings and final assessment order passed under sections 147, 144C(13), and 144B were also quashed. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 08:40:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 220 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772107</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai quashed a re-assessment notice dated 29/07/2022 issued under section 148 for assessment year 2015-16, finding it barred by limitation. Following the Supreme Court precedent in Rajeev Bansal, the tribunal held that the notice was time-barred under the Act&#039;s provisions. Consequently, the entire re-assessment proceedings and final assessment order passed under sections 147, 144C(13), and 144B were also quashed. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>