<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 224 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772111</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed the authority to condone delay in filing Form 10DA under Section 80JJAA of the Income Tax Act. It held that procedural delays should not defeat substantive rights, allowing the assessee&#039;s deduction claim despite filing Form 10DA 30 days late. The Tribunal emphasized that technical non-compliance should not result in denial of legitimate tax benefits when the form was ultimately filed with the income tax return.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 08:40:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 224 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772111</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed the authority to condone delay in filing Form 10DA under Section 80JJAA of the Income Tax Act. It held that procedural delays should not defeat substantive rights, allowing the assessee&#039;s deduction claim despite filing Form 10DA 30 days late. The Tribunal emphasized that technical non-compliance should not result in denial of legitimate tax benefits when the form was ultimately filed with the income tax return.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>