<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 225 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772112</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune held that ex-gratia compensation received by assessee upon premature termination of employment constituted a capital receipt exempt from tax, not &quot;profits in lieu of salary&quot; taxable under section 17(3)(i). The Tribunal found the payment was voluntary without any employer obligation under service rules, following precedent in similar cases. The CIT(A)/NFAC order was set aside, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition. Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 11:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 225 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772112</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune held that ex-gratia compensation received by assessee upon premature termination of employment constituted a capital receipt exempt from tax, not &quot;profits in lieu of salary&quot; taxable under section 17(3)(i). The Tribunal found the payment was voluntary without any employer obligation under service rules, following precedent in similar cases. The CIT(A)/NFAC order was set aside, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition. Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>