https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772115 ITAT remitted the matter to ld. CIT(E) after finding the rejection of the 80G(5) approval resulted from a bona fide error in selecting sub-clause (iv) instead of (ii)/(iii) when filing Form 10AB and the assessee was denied a hearing. The tribunal directed ld. CIT(E) to grant final approval under clause (iii) to the first proviso to s.80G(5) if the assessee is otherwise eligible, and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes. en-us Mon, 26 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Sep 2025 10:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772115 ITAT remitted the matter to ld. CIT(E) after finding the rejection of the 80G(5) approval resulted from a bona fide error in selecting sub-clause (iv) instead of (ii)/(iii) when filing Form 10AB and the assessee was denied a hearing. The tribunal directed ld. CIT(E) to grant final approval under clause (iii) to the first proviso to s.80G(5) if the assessee is otherwise eligible, and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 26 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772115