<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 240 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772127</link>
    <description>NRI challenged reassessment proceedings initiated by tax authorities under Section 148 of Income Tax Act. HC ruled that mere property purchase and non-filing of return does not constitute sufficient grounds for reassessment. Court found no prima facie evidence of escaped income, rejecting AO&#039;s notice as invalid. Proceedings were quashed, emphasizing strict requirements for initiating tax reassessment against non-resident taxpayers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 08:40:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 240 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772127</link>
      <description>NRI challenged reassessment proceedings initiated by tax authorities under Section 148 of Income Tax Act. HC ruled that mere property purchase and non-filing of return does not constitute sufficient grounds for reassessment. Court found no prima facie evidence of escaped income, rejecting AO&#039;s notice as invalid. Proceedings were quashed, emphasizing strict requirements for initiating tax reassessment against non-resident taxpayers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>