<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 242 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772129</link>
    <description>Seized diary entries recording flat-booking receipts, when reconciled with regular books of account and other search material, can validly support additions for unexplained income if they reveal unrecorded cash receipts. The Delhi High Court noted that the phrase &quot;books or books of account&quot; in Section 2(12A) is wide enough to include diary-form records where accounts or part of accounts are entered. On the facts, the diaries were not treated as mere dumb documents, and the search material retained evidentiary value because it bore on income. No substantial question of law arose, and the challenge to the additions failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 08:40:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 242 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772129</link>
      <description>Seized diary entries recording flat-booking receipts, when reconciled with regular books of account and other search material, can validly support additions for unexplained income if they reveal unrecorded cash receipts. The Delhi High Court noted that the phrase &quot;books or books of account&quot; in Section 2(12A) is wide enough to include diary-form records where accounts or part of accounts are entered. On the facts, the diaries were not treated as mere dumb documents, and the search material retained evidentiary value because it bore on income. No substantial question of law arose, and the challenge to the additions failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>