<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 248 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772135</link>
    <description>HC ruled that GST provisions do not apply retrospectively to works contracts where services were rendered before 01.07.2017. Authorities lack jurisdiction to issue notices or take coercive action under GST Act from that date. The Court directed respondent (BDA) to consider the petitioner&#039;s VAT refund claim of Rs. 34,03,391 within six weeks, emphasizing GST&#039;s collect-and-pay principle and rejecting retrospective tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 248 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772135</link>
      <description>HC ruled that GST provisions do not apply retrospectively to works contracts where services were rendered before 01.07.2017. Authorities lack jurisdiction to issue notices or take coercive action under GST Act from that date. The Court directed respondent (BDA) to consider the petitioner&#039;s VAT refund claim of Rs. 34,03,391 within six weeks, emphasizing GST&#039;s collect-and-pay principle and rejecting retrospective tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>