<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 103 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44123</link>
    <description>Pendency of proceedings under Section 16 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 does not automatically waive the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The appellate authority must still assess undue hardship on the facts, consider whether a prima facie case exists, and balance any dispensation against the need to safeguard revenue. Section 22 of the sick company law stays certain proceedings, but it does not create a blanket exemption from procedural conditions under the excise law. The waiver decision remains a discretionary exercise based on the statutory facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:31:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 103 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44123</link>
      <description>Pendency of proceedings under Section 16 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 does not automatically waive the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The appellate authority must still assess undue hardship on the facts, consider whether a prima facie case exists, and balance any dispensation against the need to safeguard revenue. Section 22 of the sick company law stays certain proceedings, but it does not create a blanket exemption from procedural conditions under the excise law. The waiver decision remains a discretionary exercise based on the statutory facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>